Well, seems "libgnome" was missing in the dependencies. I need to check if it should be added to backintime-gnome deps or to gnome-python deps.

Ah c'est dommage… mais comme le dis Akuna, il faut savoir prendre du recul de temps en temps. Tu as apporté beaucoup en tout cas (J'aurais jamais pensé à packagé et à avoir Xfce 4.10 sur 13.37 sans toi !). Salix-os.fr est pas mal du tout (tu en aurais fais des tests de wiki lol !), ptre qu'une perso...

kwisher, do you mean backintime for 13.37, or backintime for the 14.0 beta ?
For 13.37, it runs ok under Xfce, I use it.
For 14.0, I changed the package a bit, some you have to install backintime-cli and backintime-gnome (well in fact, it's not so gnome, it's mainly Gtk2).

Thank you !

About a Live version. Probably for the start of november. I'll wait for a final release of Salix 14.0 first, and some packages are still missing from the repo for a Live version. I also need to continue investigate on one or two problems that some users encountered with some Live configurations in 1...

I agree. I will check if this is possible using these constraints. If not, then I drop it.

How could it be "hard-wired" ? It's just a binary called from shell script. Create another script or alias named "matedialogs" and the "hard-wired" is gone. It's not a library.

Based on what I saw in the features of mate-dialogs, I'm pretty sure Yad is better and can be used in-place of mate-dialogs and zenity.

Btw, no deps ? no it cannot, it has at least GTK.

Hum... ok bu I need to evaluate mate-dialogs then, because you can do a lot of things with yad, which cannot be done with zenity, and it requires the same deps. I'm not sure that mate-dialogs can do all this. I don't see how mate-dialogs could be an absolute inclusion for mate as it is the same tool...

How the difference between mate-dialogs and yad ?